criminal revision petitions

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court recently delivered a strong message by fining a litigant Rs 1 lakh for failing to disclose pivotal information. The court highlighted that such omissions undermine the integrity of the judicial system. The litigant had previously pursued a similar case but neglected to include this fact in their current filing.

Madras High Court discharged a nephrologist and organ transplant surgeon from an illegal kidney transplant case, citing procedural violations and harassment. The court found criminal proceedings were initiated improperly by police, bypassing the mandated Appropriate Authority. This led to the doctor's discharge from all charges, deeming the case an abuse of legal process.

A recent Allahabad High Court ruling emphasizes that a wife's right to maintenance isn't solely tied to marriage duration or her qualifications. The court stressed that a wife's ability to maintain herself commensurate with her marital lifestyle, regardless of past earnings, is key. The husband's financial status and credibility were also scrutinized in this significant judgment.

New USCIS fingerprint checks are causing significant delays for immigration applications, including permanent residency and citizenship. Officials must resubmit biometrics for pending cases to the FBI's upgraded system, even if previously cleared. Attorneys warn this could lead to increased scrutiny of minor past interactions and disproportionately impact immigrants from certain regions.

Every week TOI+ subscribers send in legal questions and our panel of leading experts offers well-considered, practical, and actionable opinions on every query. From property disputes to inheritance matters, divorce queries to income tax issues, My Lawyer connects you directly with experts you can trust

A pregnant 15-yr-old’s ordeal again underscored the conceptual flaw in our abortion law. MTP law, despite amendments, makes terminating pregnancy an arbitrary process. Everyone has a say, except the woman

Delhi High Court will appoint senior lawyers as amicus curiae to argue the case for Arvind Kejriwal and two other AAP functionaries who have chosen to boycott hearings in the liquor policy case. This comes after the individuals alleged bias and conflict of interest against the presiding judge.

Under MV Act, Private Vehicles Are Entitled To 15-Year Registration Period Followed By 5-Year Renewal

Former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal's refusal to attend court proceedings in the CBI liquor policy case has prompted the High Court to consider appointing an amicus curiae. This move aims to ensure the case is heard on its merits, as the Supreme Court mandates that such matters cannot be dismissed by default.

Court Upholds Rs 8,000 Monthly Interim Maintenance

In a surprising turn of events, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has revised its earlier decision regarding an FIR against Rahul Gandhi in a case concerning dual citizenship. Acknowledging the importance of due process, the court has now mandated that the Congress leader be served a notice for a hearing.