Amid recurring concerns that northern states could gain at the expense of the South in a future Lok Sabha expansion, the historical record paints a more nuanced picture. Between 1951 and 1977, when seats were periodically redistributed after Census exercises, both the Hindi heartland and southern states saw their share of Lok Sabha seats decline. However, the decline was steeper for the Hindi belt, which lost 3.1 percentage points, compared to a 1.2 percentage point fall for the South.
Read full storyIf we listen to the entire narrative created for the South, then out of the 543 seats created by you, 129 MPs currently sit in this House, which is approximately 23.76%. In the new House, 195 MPs will be sitting here, and their power will be 23.97%"
Telangana has 17 seats, which is 3.13 per cent. After the passage of the bill, the number of MPs will increase from 17 to 26, which will be 3.18 per cent. Tamil Nadu has 49 seats, which is 7.18 per cent. After the passage of the bill, the number of MPs will be 59, and their percentage in the new House of 816 will be 7.23 per cent. Tamil Nadu will also suffer no loss. Kerala has 20 seats, which is 3.68 per cent. After the passage of the bill, the number of MPs will be 30, and their percentage in the new House will be 3.67 per cent.
Karnataka has 28 seats, and 5.15 percent of the 543 seats in the House. After the passage of the bill, the number of Karnataka MPs will increase from 28 to 42, and the percentage in the Lok Sabha will increase to 5.44. Karnataka will not suffer any loss at all. Andhra Pradesh has 25 seats, which is 4.60 percent. After the passage of the bill, the number of MPs will increase from 25 to 38. which will be 4.65 per cent.
I would just like to say that this should not be weighed on the scale of politics. Whenever we move to take a decision, those who carry responsibility for such a large parts of the country also have a right to be present here. We should not stop them. Secondly, regarding numbers, there has long been a discussion that their count should not be reduced. If it is increased, the process will move faster. That is why the proposal has come to increase it by 33 per cent so that no one feels their rights are being taken away. It will add new and additional strength. The structure of the House has already been planned accordingly, and space has been created. I would also like to say in a lighter vein that everyone has their own political reasons, and the fear of defeat can be quite striking. But whenever something good happens, there is a tradition of putting a 'kala teeka' to protect it from evil. I thank you for putting that ‘kala teeka’.
Today I have come to appeal to you not to weigh this on the scales of politics; this is a decision in the national interest.