US DoE proposes major overhaul of Institute of Education Sciences: Focus shifts to state-led, impact-oriented studies

The U.S. Department of Education has initiated a significant review of its research division, the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), following the submission of a reform report to U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon. The report, titled Reimagining the Institute of Education Sciences, was prepared by Senior Advisor Amber Northern and lays out a detailed roadmap to make federal education research more efficient, practical, and responsive to the needs of states and classrooms.

The development comes at a time when federal education policy is increasingly emphasising greater state autonomy while maintaining a national framework of research and data support. The Department stated that the goal is to ensure that IES delivers high-quality, actionable evidence that improves student outcomes from early childhood through postsecondary education.

Concerns over pace and classroom relevance

In its assessment, the report notes that although IES has maintained a strong reputation for scientific rigor over the past 25 years, its research output has often been “slow, siloed, and disconnected from classroom realities.” According to the Department, these structural issues have limited the Institute’s ability to respond quickly to emerging education challenges.

IES was established to provide national leadership in expanding fundamental knowledge and understanding of education. However, the review argues that its processes and grant structures need recalibration to better align with the immediate needs of state and district leaders.

Secretary McMahon said the administration is committed to strengthening the Institute’s core mission while ensuring that research findings translate into real improvements in classrooms across the country.

Acting IES Director Matthew Soldner reaffirmed that rigorous, objective evidence remains central to the Institute’s work. He stated that the recommendations will be considered carefully to enhance the relevance and impact of IES initiatives.

Strategic shift towards focused and coordinated research

One of the central recommendations in the report is that IES should prioritise the most urgent education challenges identified by state and district policymakers. Instead of dispersing funding across numerous disconnected projects, the Institute should adopt a more targeted research agenda driven by clearly defined national and state-level priorities.

The report also calls for a streamlined and coordinated data strategy. Over time, IES has funded multiple longitudinal surveys and data collections. While these efforts have contributed to a strong national evidence base, the review suggests that some collections may be redundant or outdated. The recommendation is to reduce overlap, modernise systems, and strengthen core statistical functions without compromising data quality.

Another major proposal is to shift from single-state or single-institution project grants toward multi-state awards. By supporting collaborative initiatives across jurisdictions, IES can help scale promising interventions, instructional strategies, and policy innovations more effectively. The aim is to move beyond isolated pilot projects and ensure that successful models are implemented more broadly.

Refocusing on practicality and implementation

The report emphasises that research should be directed toward practicality, innovation, and classroom relevance. It argues that evidence must not only be rigorous but also usable by educators, school leaders, and policymakers.

A key element of this shift involves narrowing the scope of the What Works Clearinghouse. Rather than maintaining an expansive evidence catalogue, the Clearinghouse should focus on developing practice guides and implementation tools that make research findings easier to apply in real-world settings.

Dr. Northern noted that while IES has set high standards in education research, the current challenges facing schools require a renewed focus and operational agility. The recommendations aim to modernise the Institute while preserving its commitment to scientific excellence.

If implemented, the proposed reforms would mark a strategic reset for federal education research, with stronger emphasis on speed, coordination, scalability, and measurable impact on student learning outcomes.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!