Harvard’s grading reset begins in 2027: Faculty vote to curb easy A’s in undergraduate courses

Harvard University is preparing to make one of the most closely watched changes to grading policy in American higher education, arguing that the meaning of an A grade has been diluted by years of inflation at elite campuses.

The university’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences voted earlier this month to limit the number of A grades awarded in undergraduate courses, a move that places Harvard among a small group of top institutions willing to directly intervene in grading patterns. The policy will take effect in the 2027 academic year.

At the centre of the debate is a question that has quietly unsettled universities across the United States for years: what happens when top grades become ordinary?

More than 60% of grades awarded to Harvard undergraduates in recent years fell within the A range, according to university data cited by faculty members who backed the proposal. Supporters argued that transcripts were losing their ability to distinguish exceptional academic work from strong but more routine performance.

Harvard Psychology Professor Joshua Greene, who served on the faculty subcommittee behind the proposal, said the reform was intended to reduce what he described as “the tyranny of the perfect transcript”. According to the Associated Press, Greene argued that students often avoid intellectual risk because even a small drop in grades can affect postgraduate admissions, fellowships and employment opportunities.

“The Harvard faculty voted to make their grades mean what they say they mean,” members of the faculty subcommittee said in a statement quoted by AP.

A cap aimed at changing academic incentives

Under the new system, instructors in letter-graded undergraduate courses will be permitted to award A grades to no more than 20% of students in a class, along with four additional students beyond the cap.

Harvard faculty also approved a parallel change to the honours system. Instead of relying primarily on GPA comparisons, the university will use average percentile rank when evaluating students for prizes, awards and honours distinctions.

Faculty members involved in the reform said the narrower structure was deliberate. Unlike some earlier experiments at other universities, Harvard’s policy does not restrict A-minus grades, which administrators believe may soften the impact on overall GPAs.

Government professor Alisha Holland, who co-chaired the subcommittee, said the policy was framed internally as a “pro-student reform”, according to AP. Holland, a former Princeton student, said faculty believed the system could restore credibility to academic distinctions while reducing pressure around transcript perfection.

The decision also arrives at a moment when universities in the US are facing broader public scrutiny over academic standards, admissions policies and institutional accountability.

Holland told AP that the vote demonstrated universities were “capable of governing and reforming themselves and evolving to match the challenges of our times.”

A problem universities have struggled to solve

Grade inflation has expanded steadily across American higher education over the last three decades. According to US Department of Education data cited by AP, GPAs at four-year public and nonprofit colleges rose by more than 16% between 1990 and 2020.

Elite universities have debated responses for years, often without consensus.

Princeton University introduced a grading policy in 2004 that limited A-range grades to roughly 35% of all grades awarded. But the university later abandoned the system after criticism that students were being placed at a disadvantage when competing for jobs and graduate admissions against peers from institutions with looser grading norms.

That history has shaped the caution surrounding Harvard’s move.

Amanda Claybaugh, Harvard’s dean of undergraduate education, described grade inflation as a “complex and thorny issue” in a statement carried by AP, adding that it was a problem “many people have recognized, but no one has solved.”

Some faculty members who had long criticised grading trends welcomed the vote.

Steven Pinker, the Harvard psychologist and cognitive scientist, told AP he was “delighted” by the outcome. Pinker argued that professors who maintained stricter grading standards often saw student enrolment in their courses decline, creating pressure across departments to award higher grades.

“Grade inflation forced a race to the bottom,” he said.

Students remain unconvinced

Not everyone at Harvard supported the change.

In a February survey conducted by the Harvard Undergraduate Association, nearly 85% of roughly 800 responding students opposed the proposal to limit A-range grades, according to AP.

Association co-presidents Zach Berg and Daniel Zhao said in a statement Wednesday that while students recognised concerns with the current grading system, they were disappointed that student voices “have not been centered throughout the decision-making process.”

The resistance reflects a larger anxiety embedded in elite higher education: students fear becoming less competitive in systems where grades continue to function as a sorting mechanism for internships, scholarships and graduate admissions.

Harvard faculty rejected one alternative proposal that would have allowed courses to opt out of the A-grade cap by moving to a satisfactory/unsatisfactory grading model with a separate SAT+ distinction for exceptional performance.

More than a grading debate

The policy will be formally reviewed after three years, leaving open the possibility of revision if departments report unintended academic or administrative consequences.

Still, the significance of the decision may extend beyond Harvard itself.

For years, many universities defended rising grades by arguing that incoming students were stronger, more prepared and more academically driven than earlier generations. Harvard’s vote suggests a shift in how at least part of the academic establishment now views the issue.

Stuart Rojstaczer, who has tracked grade inflation trends in the United States for years, told AP that Harvard faculty had historically maintained their students deserved unusually high grades.

“This is a real cultural shift,” he said.

Whether other universities follow may depend less on educational philosophy than on institutional risk. In competitive academic ecosystems, grading policies rarely operate in isolation. One university tightening standards while others continue inflating grades can reshape how students calculate opportunity, pressure and reward.

For now, Harvard has decided that scarcity itself may need to return to the meaning of an A.

Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!