This story is from November 10, 2020
Fate of Obamacare law rests with US Supreme Court once again
WASHINGTON: The conservative-majority US Supreme Court on Tuesday dives back into politically perilous waters as it hears arguments over a Republican challenge backed by President Donald Trump's administration aiming to invalidate the
President-elect Joe Biden has criticized Republican efforts to throw out the
The case represents the latest Republican legal attack on the 2010 law, which was the signature domestic policy achievement of Democratic former President Barack Obama, under whom Biden served as vice president.
The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority after the Republican-led Senate last month confirmed Trump's third appointee, Amy Coney Barrett. Most legal experts think the justices will stop short of a seismic ruling striking down Obamacare. The Supreme Court in 2012 and 2015 fended off previous Republican challenges to it.
Republican-governed states led by Texas, later backed by Trump's administration, sued in 2018 in Texas to strike down the law. The justices are due to hear 80 minutes of arguments by teleconference in an appeal by a coalition of Democratic-led states including California and New York and the Democratic-led House of Representatives to preserve Obamacare.
If Obamacare were to be struck down, up to 20 million Americans could lose medical insurance and insurers could once again refuse to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions. Obamacare expanded public healthcare programs and created marketplaces for private insurance.
"We believe there are nine justices who connect the dots and see how important this is," said California attorney general Xavier Becerra, a Democrat who is leading the coalition of 20 states defending Obamacare.
"We think there's a very strong chance that Americans will continue to have good healthcare coverage," Becerra added.
Texas-based US District Court Judge Reed O'Connor in 2018 ruled that Obamacare was unconstitutional as currently structured in light of a Republican-backed change made by Congress a year earlier.
The New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals last year partially upheld that ruling, saying the law's "individual mandate," which required people to obtain insurance or pay a financial penalty, afoul of the Constitution. But the 5th Circuit stopped short of striking down the law. The Democratic-led states and the House then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The 2012 Supreme Court ruling upheld most Obamacare provisions including the individual mandate. The court defined this penalty as a tax and thus found the law permissible under the Constitution's provision empowering Congress to levy taxes.
In 2017, Trump signed a law that eliminated the financial penalty under the individual mandate, which gave rise to the Republican lawsuit. With that change, the individual mandate could no longer be interpreted as a tax provision and was therefore unlawful, the Republican challengers argued.
Obamacare
healthcare law.President-elect Joe Biden has criticized Republican efforts to throw out the
Affordable Care Act
(ACA), as the law is formally known, in the midst of a deadly coronavirus pandemic and hopes to buttress Obamacare after taking office on Jan. 20.The case represents the latest Republican legal attack on the 2010 law, which was the signature domestic policy achievement of Democratic former President Barack Obama, under whom Biden served as vice president.
The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority after the Republican-led Senate last month confirmed Trump's third appointee, Amy Coney Barrett. Most legal experts think the justices will stop short of a seismic ruling striking down Obamacare. The Supreme Court in 2012 and 2015 fended off previous Republican challenges to it.
Republican-governed states led by Texas, later backed by Trump's administration, sued in 2018 in Texas to strike down the law. The justices are due to hear 80 minutes of arguments by teleconference in an appeal by a coalition of Democratic-led states including California and New York and the Democratic-led House of Representatives to preserve Obamacare.
If Obamacare were to be struck down, up to 20 million Americans could lose medical insurance and insurers could once again refuse to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions. Obamacare expanded public healthcare programs and created marketplaces for private insurance.
"We think there's a very strong chance that Americans will continue to have good healthcare coverage," Becerra added.
Texas-based US District Court Judge Reed O'Connor in 2018 ruled that Obamacare was unconstitutional as currently structured in light of a Republican-backed change made by Congress a year earlier.
The New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals last year partially upheld that ruling, saying the law's "individual mandate," which required people to obtain insurance or pay a financial penalty, afoul of the Constitution. But the 5th Circuit stopped short of striking down the law. The Democratic-led states and the House then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The 2012 Supreme Court ruling upheld most Obamacare provisions including the individual mandate. The court defined this penalty as a tax and thus found the law permissible under the Constitution's provision empowering Congress to levy taxes.
In 2017, Trump signed a law that eliminated the financial penalty under the individual mandate, which gave rise to the Republican lawsuit. With that change, the individual mandate could no longer be interpreted as a tax provision and was therefore unlawful, the Republican challengers argued.
Top Comment
New India
1500 days ago
Kavanaugh suggests it's not court's role to invalidate entire ACA. The same guy the shameless left tried to character assassinate during his hearings. Just a bunch of vindictive, petulant children who cry foul when they even sense things may not go their way. No wonder all the businesses were boarded up fearing a Trump win.Read allPost comment
Popular from World
- 'Jaishankar said it best': Putin talks about Brics, Ukraine, Trump & Syria in annual news conference
- Wisconsin shooter Natalie Rupnow's 'scum' parents divorced twice: What she wrote about them
- American Airlines flight flooded 30,000 feet above ground: 'Imagine drowning in air'
- Wisconsin shooter Natalie Rupnow's motive was to seek 'infamy': 'Would rather be dead than...'
- US sheriff sends drone to follow mysterious objects in New Jersey sky: Here's what happened next
end of article
Trending Stories
- Luigi Mangione's motive revealed: Plan made in August as 'UnitedHealthcare checks every box'
- American Airlines flight flooded 30,000 feet above ground: 'Imagine drowning in air'
- Bears Star’s two-word message as Cole Kmet walks away from Caleb Williams & Co.
- 41% of young Americans find UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson's killing 'acceptable': Survey
- Stephen Curry's wife Ayesha Curry's Net Worth, Profession, Personal life details and more
- 'Hawk Tuah' girl Hailey Welch sued for memecoin disaster: Misused celebrity status
- 26/11 accused to be extradited to India? US government asks Supreme Court to dismiss Tahawwur Rana's plea
Visual Stories
- 10 beautiful animals that are pink in colour
- 9 vegetarian dishes shine in the ‘100 Best Dishes in the World’ list
- How to grow Spring Onion in the kitchen garden without soil (you only need water!)
- How to make nutrition-rich and super delicious Bathua Paneer Paratha
- 10 best places to visit in North India for a thrilling wildlife experience
UP NEXT