Actor assault case: Prosecution calls Dileep acquittal unsustainable, appeal to be filed soon

Actor assault case: Prosecution calls Dileep acquittal unsustainable, appeal to be filed soon
Prosecutors are challenging the recent acquittal of actor Dileep and three others in connection with a 2017 assault case, labeling the decision as unacceptable. A damning report reveals inconsistencies in how evidence was assessed, suggesting a troubling bias that led to the dismissal of pivotal information without justifiable cause.
The prosecution in the 2017 actor assault case has evaluated the trial court judgement acquitting Malayalam film star Dileep and three others as unsustainable.The report filed by Special Public Prosecutor V Aja Kumar and submitted to the Director General of Prosecution for filing an appeal against the judgment of the Ernakulam District Principal Sessions Court was highly critical of the acquittal of the accused persons, including Dileep, and the sentence awarded to six convicted persons.
Dileep’s acquittal shocks industry as six co-accused convicted in high-profile Kerala actor assault case
"The trial court has applied double standards of evaluation of evidence while evaluating the evidence of prosecution as against A1 to A7 and as against A7, A8, A9 and A15, especially in respect to A8 and A15," the report said.A8 is Dileep and A15 is his friend Sarath G Nair.The prosecution, in its report, said that evidence adduced by it was appreciated in a most unfair, non-judicious and partisan manner."Most of the valuable pieces of evidence were either ignored or discarded without any valid reasons," the report said.According to the prosecution, the reasons given by the trial court for rejecting the evidence it produced are flimsy and non-judicious.The prosecution noted that the sentence given to the six convicted persons was only 20 years of imprisonment, whereas the maximum punishment is life imprisonment.It also alleged that the judgment, which runs to 1,709 pages, was very difficult for anybody to read and understand easily.
"The judgment is unnecessarily lengthy, and the same has become voluminous because of discussion on irrelevant matters, and illegal justifications even to justify the serious lapses on the part of the trial judge as well as counsels of Dileep and Sarath during the course of the trial," the report added.Last month, the trial court had acquitted Dileep and three others, while sentencing the first six accused, including prime accused Pulsar Suni, to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment.Lawyers associated with the prosecution said that the state government has already given its nod to file an appeal before the Kerala High Court.The appeal application will be filed before the court soon, an official said.

author
About the AuthorTOI Entertainment Desk

The TOI Entertainment Desk is a dynamic and dedicated team of journalists, working tirelessly to bring the pulse of the entertainment world straight to the readers of The Times of India. No red carpet goes unrolled, no stage goes dark - our team spans the globe, bringing you the latest scoops and insider insights from Bollywood to Hollywood, and every entertainment hotspot in between. We don't just report; we tell tales of stardom and stories untold. Whether it's the rise of a new sensation or the seasoned journey of an industry veteran, the TOI Entertainment Desk is your front-row seat to the fascinating narratives that shape the entertainment landscape. Beyond the breaking news, we present a celebration of culture. We explore the intersections of entertainment with society, politics, and everyday life.

End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media