This story is from March 14, 2022
Jammu and Kashmir: Udhampur Court rejects bail plea to four in abetment to suicide case
JAMMU: Principal District & Session Judge Udhampur
After hearing P.P for the state and counsel for the accused, the judge observed that Shiv Raj has not been traced so far dead or alive and their release at this stage could certainly affect the trial.
However, accused
Meanwhile, the court rejected the bail plea of other four accused namely Din Mohammad, Sadeeq, Ashiq Ali and Mohammad Hassan as pre-mature.
Senior Public Prosecutor, Koshal Kotwal for the state resisted the application on the grounds that all of the accused persons, with common criminal intention, wrongfully restrained and made a murderous assault on Shiv Raj who has not been traced dead or alive thereafter.
“Although the accused persons are charged with the commission of offences under sections 306, 382, 147 IPC, however, taking stock of the evidence on record and the conduct of the accused persons, they don’t deserve to be bailed out at the stage of proceedings," senior Public Prosecutor added.
He added that the trial is also at the very inception and statements of material witnesses are yet to be recorded, as such, applicants are not entitled to bail at this stage.
Y P Bourney
on Monday rejected the bail application of four accused in much publicized abetment tosuicide case
occurred in Seoj Dhar (High altitude pass
) area of Basantgarh Tehsil in Udhampur district. However, one accused was granted bail.However, accused
Hassan Din
is admitted to interim bail after taking into account the nature of evidence against him.Meanwhile, the court rejected the bail plea of other four accused namely Din Mohammad, Sadeeq, Ashiq Ali and Mohammad Hassan as pre-mature.
Senior Public Prosecutor, Koshal Kotwal for the state resisted the application on the grounds that all of the accused persons, with common criminal intention, wrongfully restrained and made a murderous assault on Shiv Raj who has not been traced dead or alive thereafter.
“Although the accused persons are charged with the commission of offences under sections 306, 382, 147 IPC, however, taking stock of the evidence on record and the conduct of the accused persons, they don’t deserve to be bailed out at the stage of proceedings," senior Public Prosecutor added.
He added that the trial is also at the very inception and statements of material witnesses are yet to be recorded, as such, applicants are not entitled to bail at this stage.
Popular from City
- Government staggers office timings to improve air
- 'Vilasrao was best CM, had developed tactics to lead coalition government': Ajit Pawar
- Mumbai: Fire breaks out at BKC metro station
- Party, high-speed, torn sunroof: How a night out turned fatal for six friends in Dehradun
- Broken Bridge to be restored,six roads set to be widened
end of article
Trending Stories
- Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul Fight Live Updates: Will Jake Paul survive the wrath of Mike Tyson?
- Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul: Live streaming, full match card, when and where to watch fight in India and USA
- 10 newborns burned to death in fire at Jhansi government hospital
- ICC asks PCB to cancel Champions Trophy tour in PoK
- 'That feeling when knee surgery is tomorrow': What does the viral meme mean
- Mumbai: Fire breaks out at BKC metro station
- Team India's Wanderers wonder: Full list of records broken against South Africa
Visual Stories
- 10 desert animals of India
- How to make high-protein Soya-Paneer Biryani
- 8 traditional baby girl names that sound modern
- 10 rare animal species found only in China
- How to grow Strawberry in home garden during winters
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment