Convicted of causing death by negligence, driver fined Rs 10k
Panaji: A Valpoi court has convicted Gajanan Naik for causing death by negligence and for rash and negligent driving in connection with a 2024 accident. Naik had rammed a Volkswagen car into a motorcycle, resulting in the death of rider Ulhas Laxman Gaonkar. The court imposed a total fine of Rs 10,000 on the accused.
The court observed that Naik, 33, is a first-time offender with no previous convictions. It noted that all three offences for which he was convicted carry the option of a fine in lieu of imprisonment and, accordingly, directed him to pay a total fine of Rs 10,000 instead of serving a full-term sentence.
The court held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through the testimony of the pancha witness, the scene-of-accident panchanama, and the testimonies of the eyewitness and complainant.
Observing that the offence of causing death by negligence is punishable with imprisonment, fine, or both, the court imposed a fine of Rs 8,500 under the relevant section. For rash and negligent driving—punishable with imprisonment of up to six months, a fine of up to Rs 1,000, or both — the court imposed a fine of Rs 1,000. An additional fine of Rs 500 was imposed for causing hurt by an act endangering life.
According to the prosecution, the accused was driving a Volkswagen Ameo in a rash and negligent manner on Jan 1, 2024, while travelling from Valpoi to Thane, when he collided with a motorcycle coming from the opposite direction. Gaonkar sustained grievous injuries and later succumbed to them while undergoing treatment at GMC.
Assistant public prosecutors C Sawant and A Harlarnekar submitted that Gajanan had moved onto the wrong side of the road before crashing into the motorcycle.
The court observed that while speed alone cannot determine rash or negligent driving, the prosecution established through eyewitness and pancha witness testimony that the accused overtook the eyewitness at high speed, moved onto the wrong side of the road, and crashed into the oncoming motorcycle.
“The fact that the accused was present at the spot and pointed out the point of impact is corroborated by the testimony of the complainant, who categorically deposed that the accused was present at the scene and identified him in court,” stated Purva V Naik gram nyayadhikari, court of gram nyayalaya, Sattari at Valpoi.
The court further noted that the motor vehicle inspection reports of both vehicles supported the prosecution’s case and revealed no mechanical defect in the offending vehicle.
The court directed that the total fine amount of Rs 10,000 be paid to the family of the deceased.
The court held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through the testimony of the pancha witness, the scene-of-accident panchanama, and the testimonies of the eyewitness and complainant.
Observing that the offence of causing death by negligence is punishable with imprisonment, fine, or both, the court imposed a fine of Rs 8,500 under the relevant section. For rash and negligent driving—punishable with imprisonment of up to six months, a fine of up to Rs 1,000, or both — the court imposed a fine of Rs 1,000. An additional fine of Rs 500 was imposed for causing hurt by an act endangering life.
According to the prosecution, the accused was driving a Volkswagen Ameo in a rash and negligent manner on Jan 1, 2024, while travelling from Valpoi to Thane, when he collided with a motorcycle coming from the opposite direction. Gaonkar sustained grievous injuries and later succumbed to them while undergoing treatment at GMC.
Assistant public prosecutors C Sawant and A Harlarnekar submitted that Gajanan had moved onto the wrong side of the road before crashing into the motorcycle.
The court observed that while speed alone cannot determine rash or negligent driving, the prosecution established through eyewitness and pancha witness testimony that the accused overtook the eyewitness at high speed, moved onto the wrong side of the road, and crashed into the oncoming motorcycle.
The court further noted that the motor vehicle inspection reports of both vehicles supported the prosecution’s case and revealed no mechanical defect in the offending vehicle.
The court directed that the total fine amount of Rs 10,000 be paid to the family of the deceased.
You Can Also Check: Gold Rate in Goa | Silver Rate in Goa | Bank Holidays in Goa | Public Holidays in Goa | Petrol Price in Goa
Comments
Be the first to share a thought and become theFirst Voiceof this News Article
end of article
In Goa
- Diesel price hike: Pvt bus operators in Goa cut trips
- Parab douses RG’s ‘uzzo’ as he quits party and politics
- From kingmakers to survival mode: Goa’s regional parties face uncertain future
- Tourism issues need shared responsibility across all depts: Khaunte
- With beer, fish and shacks, CM moves to attract digital nomads
- Convicted of causing death by negligence, driver fined Rs 10k
- South Goa logs over 6k olive ridley eggs, half of last season
Featured In City
- 3/4th of Delhi’s land area under recurring heat stress over 10 years
- ‘No sacrifice of cows, calves, camels’: Ahead of Bakrid, Delhi govt warns against illegal slaughter, guidelines issued
- DRI seizes RS 10.48 crore heroin from Kathmandu-Delhi bus passenger in Lucknow, Mizoram man offered RS 50k arrested
- Several shops gutted after fire breaks out in Hardoi
- Overfishing, climate shifts can sharply reduce India’s sardine count: Study
- Madhya Pradesh govt recommends CBI probe into Twisha Sharma death case
- Maharashtra U-19 State Badminton Selection tournament: Gowtham Hari rallies to win; seeded players on track
Photostories
- "They temporarily close down the mess because of me." Sundar Pichai on being popular for a day in college
- Success quote of the day by Albert Einstein: "Try not to become a man of success, but..."
- Gigi Hadid's New York apartment is all about a millennial's rustic and boho in modernity: 5 artsy inspirations to steal
- 7 things children remember about their parents forever
- Dowry harassment to divorce settlement: 5 Indian marital cases that changed marriage rights for women
- Could a human survive an anaconda squeeze?
- 8 smart air fryer hacks that will make cooking easier
- Why many eye diseases show no symptoms in the beginning
- 10 legal documents you must check before buying a property in India
- Nelson Mandela quotes that define courage, leadership, and resilience
Videos
04:42 Venezuela Overtakes Saudi Arabia As India’s Third-Largest Oil Supplier Amid Global Energy Turmoil- Marco Rubio Calls India “Great Ally”, Says US Ready To Sell Massive Energy Supply To New Delhi
- Bhojshala Dispute Reaches Supreme Court As Muslim Side Challenges MP High Court Temple Verdict
- FIR Filed Against Parambrata Chattopadhyay & Swastika Mukherjee Over 2021 Social Media Posts
- FIR Filed Against Parambrata Chattopadhyay & Swastika Mukherjee Over 2021 Social Media Posts
04:03 “Viksit Bharat 2047 Is Our Commitment”: PM Modi Pushes Faster Governance At Key Ministers’ Meet- CBI Frees UP Man In Suvendu Adhikari PA Murder Case; Raj Singh Alleges Torture, Encounter Threat
07:37 Calcutta High Court Junks Pleas On West Bengal Cattle Slaughter Rules Ahead Of Bakr Eid03:04 ‘Menon’ Surname Row: VD Satheesan Faces Heat From Kerala Congress Leaders Over Oath Name Choice
Hot Picks
Top Trends
Up Next
Follow Us On Social Media