How 'collapse' of Trump’s tariff strategy led to US launching trade policy investigation - what it means for India
The Donald Trump administration's move to launch investigations into the trade practices of sixteen economies, including India, sends the signal that the US trade policy is entering a new phase. On March 11, 2026, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) initiated a new series of investigations under Section 301, focusing on the trade policies and industrial practices of sixteen economies.
The economies included in the investigation are China, the European Union, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, South Korea, Vietnam, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Japan and India.
03:53
The inquiry will examine a broad range of industries such as steel, aluminium, automobiles, batteries, electronics, chemicals, machinery, semiconductors and solar modules.
According to an analysis by Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), the move is important since it comes after the US Supreme Court rules that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs are illegal. The think tank has called the investigation a result of the 'collapse' of the US tariff strategy.
“The revival of Section 301 investigations signals that US trade policy is entering a new phase following the court ruling that curtailed Washington’s tariff powers. With its earlier tariff strategy effectively dismantled, the United States appears to be turning to trade investigations and targeted measures to maintain leverage in negotiations with trading partners,” says GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava.
Following the ruling, Washington moved quickly to introduce a new measure. Within hours, it imposed a 10% tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, shifting from targeted tariffs to a standard duty applied across all countries.
This change, however, created complications for the United States. A number of countries had previously concluded trade arrangements with Washington under the earlier system of reciprocal tariffs. Those agreements involved negotiated tariff levels that were higher than the newly imposed rate. For instance, the European Union, Japan and South Korea had accepted tariffs of about 15%, while Vietnam and Taiwan had agreed to around 20%. Indonesia and Thailand had negotiated duties of roughly 19%.
“After the court ruling introduced a universal 10% tariff, those negotiated advantages effectively disappeared, prompting some governments to reconsider the value of trade deals with the US,” notes GTRI.
Many of the economies now subject to the Section 301 investigations had already finalized some form of trade arrangement or framework with Washington after April 2025. For example, China currently operates under a temporary tariff arrangement. Meanwhile, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Thailand, Mexico and India are still engaged in negotiations.
India, for instance, issued a joint statement with the United States on February 6, 2026. Under this understanding, New Delhi agreed to lower tariffs on a range of products, showed intent to purchase more than $500 billion worth of US goods over five years, ease certain digital regulations affecting American technology companies and reduce specific regulatory barriers facing US exports.
The US probe highlights multiple sectors in India where it believes there could be structural overcapacity or export surpluses. These sectors include solar modules, petrochemicals, steel, textiles, health-related products, construction materials and automotive goods.
According to the US notification, India’s manufacturing capacity for solar modules is already close to three times the level of domestic demand, which indicates the potential for production surpluses aimed at export markets. The notice also points to similar concerns regarding the rapid expansion of capacity in sectors such as petrochemicals and steel.
President Donald Trump has cautioned trading partners against attempting to reopen or renegotiate these agreements.
According to GTRI, Section 301 continues to be a significant instrument in US trade policy, though it operates more slowly and under tighter legal constraints compared with the reciprocal tariff system that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Investigations under Section 301 require clear evidence that specific trade practices have caused harm.
Washington may also consider imposing tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which permits trade restrictions on the grounds of national security. This provision has previously been used to apply substantial duties on steel and aluminium and could potentially be extended to other sectors.
Under Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974, the United States government has the authority to examine whether trade practices adopted by other countries are unfair or discriminatory and whether they adversely affect US trade.
These investigations will assess whether measures such as industrial subsidies, government-backed manufacturing push, the role of state-owned enterprises, restrictions on market access, currency-related policies or weak domestic demand have contributed to excess global manufacturing capacity that places pressure on US industries.
If the inquiry determines that such practices exist, the United States may respond with countermeasures. These could include the imposition of additional tariffs, limits on import volumes or other forms of trade restrictions.
The investigation will proceed through a structured process. Public dockets for written comments will open on March 17, 2026, enabling businesses, industry associations and governments to submit their views.
Written submissions and requests to appear at the hearings must be filed by April 15. Public hearings are scheduled to be held from May 5 to May 8 at the US International Trade Commission in Washington.
Parties wishing to submit rebuttal comments will have seven days after the conclusion of the hearings to do so. Following consultations with the governments involved, the USTR will decide whether the practices being examined justify retaliatory trade measures.
Ready to Make a Smarter Property Decision? Build Your Legacy with TOI Homes.
Israel Iran War
India Among 60 Nations Under New Trade Probe By Trump Administration Over Forced Labour Imports
The inquiry will examine a broad range of industries such as steel, aluminium, automobiles, batteries, electronics, chemicals, machinery, semiconductors and solar modules.
Trump’s Tariff Policy Dismantled
According to an analysis by Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), the move is important since it comes after the US Supreme Court rules that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs are illegal. The think tank has called the investigation a result of the 'collapse' of the US tariff strategy.
“The revival of Section 301 investigations signals that US trade policy is entering a new phase following the court ruling that curtailed Washington’s tariff powers. With its earlier tariff strategy effectively dismantled, the United States appears to be turning to trade investigations and targeted measures to maintain leverage in negotiations with trading partners,” says GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava.
This change, however, created complications for the United States. A number of countries had previously concluded trade arrangements with Washington under the earlier system of reciprocal tariffs. Those agreements involved negotiated tariff levels that were higher than the newly imposed rate. For instance, the European Union, Japan and South Korea had accepted tariffs of about 15%, while Vietnam and Taiwan had agreed to around 20%. Indonesia and Thailand had negotiated duties of roughly 19%.
“After the court ruling introduced a universal 10% tariff, those negotiated advantages effectively disappeared, prompting some governments to reconsider the value of trade deals with the US,” notes GTRI.
What it means for India
Many of the economies now subject to the Section 301 investigations had already finalized some form of trade arrangement or framework with Washington after April 2025. For example, China currently operates under a temporary tariff arrangement. Meanwhile, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Thailand, Mexico and India are still engaged in negotiations.
India, for instance, issued a joint statement with the United States on February 6, 2026. Under this understanding, New Delhi agreed to lower tariffs on a range of products, showed intent to purchase more than $500 billion worth of US goods over five years, ease certain digital regulations affecting American technology companies and reduce specific regulatory barriers facing US exports.
The US probe highlights multiple sectors in India where it believes there could be structural overcapacity or export surpluses. These sectors include solar modules, petrochemicals, steel, textiles, health-related products, construction materials and automotive goods.
According to the US notification, India’s manufacturing capacity for solar modules is already close to three times the level of domestic demand, which indicates the potential for production surpluses aimed at export markets. The notice also points to similar concerns regarding the rapid expansion of capacity in sectors such as petrochemicals and steel.
President Donald Trump has cautioned trading partners against attempting to reopen or renegotiate these agreements.
According to GTRI, Section 301 continues to be a significant instrument in US trade policy, though it operates more slowly and under tighter legal constraints compared with the reciprocal tariff system that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Investigations under Section 301 require clear evidence that specific trade practices have caused harm.
Washington may also consider imposing tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which permits trade restrictions on the grounds of national security. This provision has previously been used to apply substantial duties on steel and aluminium and could potentially be extended to other sectors.
What is the investigation process?
Under Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974, the United States government has the authority to examine whether trade practices adopted by other countries are unfair or discriminatory and whether they adversely affect US trade.
These investigations will assess whether measures such as industrial subsidies, government-backed manufacturing push, the role of state-owned enterprises, restrictions on market access, currency-related policies or weak domestic demand have contributed to excess global manufacturing capacity that places pressure on US industries.
If the inquiry determines that such practices exist, the United States may respond with countermeasures. These could include the imposition of additional tariffs, limits on import volumes or other forms of trade restrictions.
The investigation will proceed through a structured process. Public dockets for written comments will open on March 17, 2026, enabling businesses, industry associations and governments to submit their views.
Written submissions and requests to appear at the hearings must be filed by April 15. Public hearings are scheduled to be held from May 5 to May 8 at the US International Trade Commission in Washington.
Parties wishing to submit rebuttal comments will have seven days after the conclusion of the hearings to do so. Following consultations with the governments involved, the USTR will decide whether the practices being examined justify retaliatory trade measures.
Ready to Make a Smarter Property Decision? Build Your Legacy with TOI Homes.
Top Comment
H
Hari Sud
18 minutes ago
Trump’s failed trade policy is still not clear that why 18% tariff on India when others pay only 15% and that too for 5 months.Read allPost comment
Popular from Business
- Gulf crisis fallout: US temporarily allows sale of some Russian oil after Iran threatens to 'set region’s oil, gas on fire'
- US launches trade inquiries on India, 14 other countries
- LPG crisis: Panic bookings by domestic consumers, server crash trigger chaos
- Middle East tensions: Firms return to WFH, travel curbs as Iran targets UAE
- Big shift in India’s job market! Why fixed term employment is the new normal and what it means for employees
end of article
Trending Stories
- US-Israel-Iran War News Live Updates: Saudi intercepts drone headed to Shaybah oil field; Israeli strikes 10 Hezbollah targets in Beirut
- India LPG Cylinder Shortage News Live Updates: Panic in Bengaluru, Mumbai, Pune amid supply fears; people queue outside gas agencies
- ‘My baby brother now belongs to Saaniya’: Sara Tendulkar’s emotional post for brother Arjun melts hearts online
- IPL 2026: Chennai Super Kings tells Madras high court it will not use Jailer, Jailer 2, or Coolie songs without Sun Pictures' license
10:57 Pakistan strikes Afghanistan's Kabul; bombs fuel depot of private airline near Kandahar airport- Dubai targeted again: Video shows thick black smoke after blasts; debris hits building
08:49 US KC-135 Stratotanker crashes in Iraq: Watch midair refuelling in action, how the process works
Featured in Business
- How collapse of Trump’s tariff strategy led to US launching trade policy investigation - what it means for India
- Gold price prediction amid US-Iran war: What's the gold rate outlook for March 13, 2026? Resistance seen near Rs 1,60,300
- Stock market today: Nifty50 goes below 23,400; BSE Sensex tumbles 900 points
- Average US mortgage rate climbs to 6.11% as Middle East tensions unsettle bond markets
- Top stocks to buy today: Stock recommendations for March 13, 2026 - check list
- Oil price today: Crude crosses $100 per barrel again amid Middle East tensions
Photostories
- Persian: 7 reasons why this cat breed is good for children
- Axar Patel’s ‘Haksh Villa’ in Nadiad, Gujarat reflects the cricketer’s relaxed lifestyle and luxury car collection
- Why is it so difficult to book a Dhikala safari in Jim Corbett National Park?
- Future mobility of tech hub: Is Bengaluru struggling due to bus shortage?
- 10 hydrating Indian breakfast dishes made with cucumber
- Why devotees are told not to take prasad home from Mehandipur Balaji Temple
- Emma Stone, Katy Perry, Bruno Mars, Nicolas Cage: Hollywood stars who changed their names and built unforgettable identities
- Baby names for boys born on Friday
- Most beautiful galaxies ever captured by NASA telescopes
- How to grow juicy watermelons in a terrace garden
Up Next